Showing posts with label Gilles Duceppe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gilles Duceppe. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

A Few Words about Gilles Duceppe


It's amazing - and impressive - how good Gilles Duceppe has been looking so far. And I don't just mean within the milieu of Québec; it's tough not to notice the respect and begrudging admiration English Canada seems to be giving him. Well, at least where 'English Canada' means (a) English-language media not owned by Postmedia or Quebecor and (b) people I know and talk to here in Toronto.

Duceppe has really come out fighting, painting Harper as a hypocrite and a religious nut. He's waving that letter to Adrienne Clarkson around, he's speaking confidently, he's funny, he's passionate. He's (bizarrely) reassuring.

And he's speaking a hell of a lot of English. Why is he speaking so much English? Well, Québec has perhaps a million anglophones and allophones... could he be speaking to them? I suppose it's possible, though Québec anglos are about as likely to vote BQ as rural Albertans are to vote Liberal. I think Duceppe is speaking to 'English Canada' - to the other nine provinces where he doesn't field candidates.

Why? Duceppe's aura has always had to do with his not having to give a damn what the rest of Canada thinks of him. I realise he's never really gone out of his way to antagonise English Canada, but he's certainly not minded the hostility many outside of his province feel toward him. Or at least hasn't seemed to.

I hear noise that this change in tone precipitates a change in the BQ. People seem to be suggesting that he BQ is starting to look like dropping overt seperatism from their platform - or at least downplaying it - to broaden their tent. Well, I don't believe it. I don't see the Bloc abandoning independence. After all, if nothing else, they don't have to: their voting base is not entirely pro-independence, and they specifically do not commit themselves to making any moves toward independence (seeing that as entirely a provincial matter).

I think it's a bit different. I think Duceppe wants to be liked as much as possible, across the country. For a man who's been in federal politics for twenty years, there is a legacy issue: I think he'd like to be remembered well. I also think, though, that twenty years in the opposition genuinely constrains him. There is a certain percentage of BQ supporters (as, incidentally there is in the NDP) who see their party's natural place on the opposition, who genuinely think that the BQ can best serve Québec's interests by standing up to the federal government, not by participating in it.

I don't believe Duceppe believes this. I admire the BQ for not going the Sinn Féin 'abstention' route, for not letting its republican stance get in the way of the actual nuts-and-bolts of getting things done for its constituents.

To this end, the BQ is just 'another party' like the others in Commons. Like the SNP or the Plaid in Westminster. And if the goal is to 'get things done for Québec' - that is, if the medium-term goal is that - then why not do whatever it takes to actually get things done?

Duceppe wants to get things done. I sense this. He wants to participate. He wants to act and enact. Good for him. And of course to that end, if he really does want to participate in a more active manner in Ottawa, it helps to be liked (to even a small degree) by the voting populaces of his possible partners - either 'coalition partners' or just less formal deal partners. However Ottawa is going to work after 2 May.

So yes, it might seems hypocritical that the man currently lambasting Harper for his anti-coalition gestures just a few years ago discussed working with him toward that end, but I would argue that it's not at all - that even more than Jack Layton, Duceppe is willing to deal with whatever devil he can find to further his interests. After all, if you look strictly at the constitutional side of it, every other party is equally 'the devil'. His seemingly natural 'allies' the Liberals are even further from his views vis-à-vis national aspirations than the Conservatives.

But there's more here than coalition hopes. Duceppe is perhaps realistic enough to recognise that he can no longer work in any reasonable fashion with Harper, and that the numbers might very easily not allow him to work with the other two (or maybe three) parties. After 2 May, Duceppe might very easily find himself permanently stuck in his opposition chair.

Or rather, not at all. I think that if Duceppe doesn't walk away in May with a concrete arrangement affording him some real say in Ottawa, I think he'll step down and move to Québec City. They say he could parachute directly into Pauline Marois's job, perhaps paving the way for the strongest victory the PQ has ever had, whenever the next election occurs. It goes without saying, of course, that if such an event comes to pass, all the work he's doing at the moment painting Harper as a corrupt man out of touch with the voting public will serve as excellent practice for a future showdown with Jean Charest. And I think a Premier Duceppe would talk referendum, given the right mood - but not without actively engaging with the rest of Canada. It's clear Duceppe wants an independent Québec, but not one that functions as an enemy to what would remain of Canada. And as such he doesn't want to be an enemy either.

What he wants, seemingly is to be a 'partner'. In whatever way he can make that happen.

And good for him. There is a lot that all other party leaders can learn from him.

Friday, March 26, 2010

Canadian Political Leaders Quiz: page eight

Michael IgnatieffImage via Wikipedia
This is page seven of a quiz. If you're flying in here from a Google search or something, click here to go to page one.

So, the results to the last question then:
  1. Entered electoral politics in 1980 as a member of the so-called "Small Party". Elizabeth May.
  2. Never changed parties, but father was a Progressive Conservative cabinet minister and grandfather was an Union Nationale cabinet minister. Jack Layton.
  3. Ties to current party go back to 1965, but rather inconsistently until 2004. Michael Ignatieff.
  4. Was a Young Liberal before being elected as an MP for three different parties. Stephen Harper.
  5. Was a member of the Workers' Communist Party of Canada for three years. Was first elected to parliament as an independent. Gilles Duceppe.
Duceppe's Maoist history is yet another surprising fact about him. Harper the Liberal surprised me too.

So that's it for now. Seven questions is hardly comprehensive, and my resources (mostly Wikipedia or their own party websites) hardly exhaustive. Still though, some brief portraits of five people who in different ways each break the mould of Prime Ministerial candidate.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Canadian Political Leaders Quiz: page four

Jack LaytonImage via Wikipedia
This is page four of a quiz. If you're flying in here from a Google search or something, click here to go to page one.

Anyway, that wide selection of cities of birth plays out as follows:
  1. Montreal, Quebec. Gilles Duceppe.
  2. Montreal, Quebec. Jack Layton.
  3. Hartford, Connecticut. Elizabeth May.
  4. Toronto, Ontario. Stephen Harper.
  5. Toronto, Ontario. Michael Ignatieff.
An odd list, and it does little for the notion of Canada-wide representation that of five leaders, there are only two Canadian birthplaces: Toronto and Montreal. No points for guessing Ignatieff is from Toronto, but a surprise to find that Stephen "The West Wants In!" Harper was not only born but grew up in Hogtown. Or that Mr. Hogtown himself, long-term Toronto city councillor Jack Layton, was in fact born in Montreal. Again no points for pinning Duceppe in Montreal, but Arnold Schwarzenegger might be intrigued to find that Elizabeth May, candidate for Prime Minister of Canada, could be President of the USA sooner than he could (foreign-born Canadian prime ministers are not unheard-of. The most recent was John Turner of Surrey, England) - I could also say that May is one of two PM candidates who self-identifies as an American...

So moving on to a list that is actually an easier one: where were their spouses born?
  1. Hong Kong.
  2. Hungary.
  3. Montreal, Quebec.
  4. Turner Valley, Alberta.
  5. unmarried.
Click here to find the answers.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Canadian Political Leaders Quiz: page three

Original description by Ted Buracas: Stephen H...Image via Wikipedia
This is page three of a quiz. If you're flying in here from a Google search or something, click here to go to page one.

The skinny on the middle names:
  1. Evans. Elizabeth May.
  2. Gilbert. Jack Layton.
  3. Grant. Michael Ignatieff.
  4. Joseph. Stephen Harper.
  5. none. Gilles Duceppe
Prize for geekiest middle name goes to Jack (John, of course, to be exact) Layton. I can't be 100% sure Duceppe doesn't have a middle name or, as a French-Canadian, five or six. But I can't see any anywhere on the net.

Carrying on with 'basic inormation', this next question is nowhere near as easy as I'd have thought it would be. Where were they born?
  1. Montreal, Quebec.
  2. Montreal, Quebec.
  3. Hartford, Connecticut.
  4. Toronto, Ontario.
  5. Toronto, Ontario.
Big list of choices, isn't it? Well, click here once you've decided.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Canadian Political Leaders Quiz: page two

Gilles Duceppe, the Leader of the Bloc Québécois.Image via Wikipedia
This is page two of a quiz. If you're flying in here from a Google search or something, click here to go to page one.

So, the answers to question one:
  1. Born 30 April 1959 - aged 50. Stephen Harper.
  2. Born 9 June 1954 - aged 55. Elizabeth May.
  3. Born 18 July 1950 - aged 59. Jack Layton.
  4. Born 12 May 1947 - aged 62. Michael Ignatieff.
  5. Born 22 July 1947 - aged 62. Gilles Duceppe.
Interesting that all five are, broadly speaking, the same generation. Aged between 50 and 62 counts as actually a relatively young bunch in the plutocratic world of politics. Also interesting is that the Prime Minister is (by a fair bit) the youngest of the bunch. For a man who's already been PM for a few years now, 50 is remarkably young. No points for picking Ignatieff as a boomer, though Duceppe doesn't seem a typical boomer.

Moving on then, to a perhaps simpler question: what are their middle names?
  1. Evans.
  2. Gilbert.
  3. Grant.
  4. Joseph.
  5. none (as far as I can tell).
Click here once you've decided.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Canadian Political Leaders Quiz: page one

Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of CanadaImage via Wikipedia
So Canada has five mainstream federal parties. Each of them has a leader at the moment who, if nothing else, is an interesting character. You could make an argument that confidence in party leaders has never been lower than it is at the moment (and you could make the case that there's never been a bunch of leaders less inspiring of confidence), but the truth remains that they are interesting individuals. That does not necessarily mean good candidates for Prime Minister, but at least it's something...

So seven questions, then. How it works is that each question is in five parts. The correct answer to one of the five is 'Stephen Harper'. The correct answer to another is 'Michael Ignatieff'. Another is 'Jack Layton', another is 'Gilles Duceppe' and another is 'Elizabeth May'. In short, match the leader to the choice that describes him/her.

Question one: simply put, how old are these folks?
  1. Born 30 April 1959 - aged 50.
  2. Born 9 June 1954 - aged 55.
  3. Born 18 July 1950 - aged 59.
  4. Born 12 May 1947 - aged 62.
  5. Born 22 July 1947 - aged 62.
Click here once you've decided in order to see the answer...
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...